27 Oct
2004
27 Oct
'04
10:44 p.m.
Juan Lang juan_lang@yahoo.com writes:
Looks good to me, Michael, though I'd suggest using /dev/random rather than /dev/urandom: the blocking behavior of the former shouldn't be a problem for Wine (since this DLL makes no timing guarantees anyway).
That doesn't mean we want to block, especially for things like CPGenRandom that don't require the highest quality randomness. I think in general /dev/urandom is a much better choice.
--
Alexandre Julliard
julliard@winehq.org