Joerg wrote:
OK, when the last discussion was going on, I started out with the
opinion
that the change would be good and changed it to not so good, because
if
proprietary stuff that *is* part of the windows kernel (or drivers)
needs
to be implemented, this can't be done with an LGPLed wine. My final
idea
(which I never mailed) was, that maybe a X11-licensed kernel
(including
wineserver and driver emulation) and LGPLed dlls for the rest would be the best solution.
I'm not sure why a re-implementation of proprietary stuff can't be done with an LGPLed Wine. If that was the case, wouldn't it be next to impossible for just about any LGPLed product to mimic the behaviour of a proprietary application? (eg KDevelop vs MSVC?)
Regards Chris Green Massey-Green Software Labs