Re: [RFC] named pipe message-mode design

[Alexandre Julliard]

Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton  writes:
> i would imagine that inefficient is the _last_ thing on the list of
> priorities.  "technically correctly fulfilling the semantics" i would
> imagine would be the highest priority.
>
> "efficient" and "nice" can always be done later, yes?

No, in many cases efficiency needs to be taken into account in the
design phase. You can't just add it later.