On Donnerstag, 14. November 2019 03:34:28 CET you wrote:
Fabian Maurer dark.shadow4@web.de wrote:
Personaly I don't expect this patch to break something.
When some programs expect a comctl32 v6, it's to be expected some expect a comctl32 v5.
Do you have an example of such an application?
No I don't. As I said, it just seems like a logical assumption.
AFAIK the proper fix would be to separate comctl32, so we have both v5 and v6.
Probably, however current maintainer seems to prefer to postpone this forever.
What makes you say that?
Regards, Fabian Maurer