Re: shlwapi: Resupply array sizes stripped by function interface

[Mikołaj Zalewski]

> I am now inclined to think - and in line with what you say - that it would be
> safer and more efficient to modify FillNumberFmt() to take two more arguments
> and pass the buffer sizes in as well, i.e., in effect, its declaration should
> be:
>
> static void
> FillNumberFmt(NUMBERFMTW *fmt, LPWSTR decimal_buffer, int decbuf_wlen,
>    LPSTR thousand_buffer, int thoubuf_wlen);
>
> Does that sound better?
>
> -- Andy.

Yes, it's probably more elegant to send the buffer sizes explicitly as 
a parameter than to use a constant.

Mikolaj Zalewski