On January 10, 2005 11:08 am, Mike Hearn wrote:
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 10:56:30 -0800, Bill Medland wrote:
Bill Medland (billmedland@mercuryspeed.com) Minor typo correction and term expansion changes
Bill, if that document was helpful I'll write some more docs for you.
Hi Mike
It was sort-of-helpful to me. Didn't really teach me anything I didn't already understand but I think it is a good introduction. It lays the groundwork and the nomenclature for further discussions.
Some more advanced stuff might be relevant and useful for getting other people involved.
For myself I am eagerly awaiting a copy of Box's Essential Com; I guess it is a bit old now but I like to read the older stuff that gives an idea of from where things came.
I don't know how much time I personally am going to be able to devote; my boss isn't particularly interested in my devoting company time to it since our code sort-of-works with existing ole32 etc. (and now I also have to keep an eye on .dotGNU and mono too).
The next bit I have to figure out is OXIDs and their marshalling etc. Maybe I'll have some more specific questions when I actually understand the language.
Did we ever get anywhere with adding some sort of DCOM-testing framework into the tests? I can't remember if it was you or Robert that mentioned resurrecting a test program.