Re: propsys: mention that the functions are stubs

[Hans Leidekker]

On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 10:25 +0200, Francois Gouget wrote:
> Just to confirm what André said, if the FIXME does not contain the word 
> 'stub', then apistats has no way to know it's a (pseudo-)stub.

Wouldn't it be sufficient for our purposes to just count every first
fixme in a WINAPI function as a stub? As it is now there's a large
percentage of fixmes that don't include the 'stub' keyword.
> I would further argue that even a human reading the log would have no
> way to know as quite a few implemented functions still dump their parameters.
> So even for humans it's better to add 'stub' to the FIXME message.

I'd say we need turn those into traces and add fixmes for the
unimplemented parts, if needed.