22 Jul
2004
22 Jul
'04
8:13 p.m.
Chipzz chipzz@ULYSSIS.Org writes:
Much to my surprise, the wine implementation has more(!!) functions than the native dll. So, I was wondering, this screws up the index of these functions in the list, right? Does that index actually matter?
No, the index doesn't matter, the functions are looked up by name, so it's mostly a cosmetic issue; but it should probably still be fixed.
--
Alexandre Julliard
julliard@winehq.org