Re: ntdll: Implement RtlCopySecurityDescriptor [take 2]

[Alexandre Julliard]

James Hawkins  writes:
> There isn't an RtlCopyAcl in ntdll, but it simplifies the code a bit
> and can be useful in other places.  For one I should've taken out the
> [NTDLL.@] because we don't export it, but should the function be named
> something else?

Yes, it should be named something like copy_acl to make it clear it's
an internal function, and it should definitely not be declared in an
exported header.