Re: Dr. Seuss, licensing, and WINE

[Dimitrie O. Paun]

On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Brett Glass wrote:
> At 07:34 AM 2/8/2002, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
> > Could you have finished wiht a more dumb line? LGPL _is_ open source my
> > friend,
>
> This is not what Richard Stallman and Bradley Kuhn of the FSF say. They
> say, most emphatically, that it is NOT Open Source.

This is BS. Go read http://www.opensource.org/, in particular:
http://www.opensource.org/licenses/index.html

You obviously don't understand the issues at hand, and you don't seem to
make an effort to do so.

What RMS claims is that the xGPL is not only "Open Source", but a Free
Software lincense.

Anyway, I really don't want to get into this debate. It really is
irrelevant for the present discussion.

--
Dimi.