Re: CPP Check 1.1.31

[Nikolay Sivov]

James McKenzie wrote:
> Nikolay Sivov wrote:
> > James McKenzie wrote:
> > > Nikolay Sivov wrote:
> > > > chris ahrendt wrote:
> > > > > Division by zero
> > > >
> > > > False positive I suppose:
> > > >
> > > > static const BYTE pad[] = {
> > > >
> > > > 'P','A','D','D','I','N','G','X','X','P','A','D','D','I','N','G' };
> > > >    DWORD i;
> > > > ->    for ( i = 0; i < size / sizeof pad; i++ )
> > >
> > > Should pad be enclosed in parenthesis?
> > >
> > > James McKenzie
> >
> > No, why?
>
> I was thinking that c specifies sizeof needs the parameter to be
> enclosed in parathesis like this sizeof (pad) but I may be incorrect.
>
> James McKenzie

This is for type names, variables could be used without enclosing.