Re: [Compile problem] GL_STENCIL_BACK_FAIL vs. GL_STENCIL_BACK_FAIL_ATI

[Vitaly Budovski]

Uwe Bonnes wrote:
> > > > > > "H" == H Verbeet  writes:
>
> ...
>     >> Appended patch lets me circumvent that problem.
>     H> I'm not sure if GL_STENCIL_BACK_FAIL and GL_STENCIL_BACK_FAIL_ATI are
>     H> interchangeable, but more importantly it makes the same kind of
>     H> assumptions about what's going to be defined.
>
> I said "circumvent" not "solve"...

This patch 
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2006-March/024775.html 
should solve the problem with missing defines.