Re: WinSpool Ordinal Addition

[Alexandre Julliard]

"Dmitry Timoshkov"  writes:
> It should be clear even for you, since you have submitted two different
> patches with ordinal 201 assigned to absolutely different functions and
> presumably both variants have worked for you. Apparently just adding
> 100 stub OrdinalBase
> should work for you too.
>
> Probably the right fix would be to add new parameter to the wine .spec
> files: "ordinal base", because for WINSPOOL.DRV it's equal to 100 in all
> variants of that DLL for me.

No, the right fix is the first one, adding a function at ordinal 100,
since there is one under Windows. It should never be necessary to
specify the ordinal base explicitly.