On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 2:28 AM, Dan Kegel dank@kegel.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 9:51 PM, James Hawkins truiken@gmail.com wrote:
I was wondering why you were getting so many msi test failures and errors! Now I know. Yes, the msi tests can't be run in parallel, even on windows.
What if I use a different msi database for each test? That'd be easy.
Yea, an easy fix would be to change the msifile constant by appending the name of the test or something. That should give a different package for each test. A more proper fix would be to have the database/package generator function create a temp filename for the package and give that back to you, but it hardly seems worth the effort.
Otherwise I'll take them out of my whitelist.
Vincent stated that he thinks the StorageImpl_Construct bug is fixed, yet I'm still seeing the errors. Vincent, can you take a look at the results?
Yes, that seems ok now, thanks.
- Dan