Re: ntdll: a simple implementation of cross-process NtAllocateVirtualMemory

[Mike Hearn]

On Sat, 03 Jun 2006 09:43:04 +0200, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> If it's a solution that can be expanded later on to cover the other
> cases, yes, but not if it's a dead-end.

When this was discussed before the idea of bringing back the service
thread was raised. I still think we should do this, assuming details like
suppressing attach notifications are done properly ...

thanks -mike