Re: the dreaded rpcss patch (rpc_J_PL0)

[Alexandre Julliard]

Greg Turner  writes:
> Still hoping for some guidance on this.  I'm happy to get rid of 
> atomicity.c as you suggest, but less happy about duplicating the (to be 
> renamed) named_pipe_kludge_client.c unit.  The prospect of keeping two 
> identical units in sync just rubs me the wrong way... it's so blatantly 
> non-orthagonal --- it seems, to me, that there must be a better way.

Do you really need the client connection stuff in rpcss?  As far as I
can tell it doesn't really do much, I'd suggest getting rid of it
somehow, and having the client part only in rpcrt4 and the server part
only in rpcss.