Re: mingwrap -> mingcc

[David Fraser]

Francois Gouget wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
> > On December 18, 2002 03:36 pm, Francois Gouget wrote:
>
> [...]
> > > winegcc
> >
> > Why not wgcc?
>
> I had the impression that we were going away from just using 'w' as the
> prefix and more towards using 'wine'. So I'm proposing both forms.
> > So I am OK with the following:
> >  wgcc
> >  mingcc
> >  wmingcc
>
> I think the ones I prefer are 'wgcc' and 'winegcc'. In both cases we can
> add variants: wcl / winecl (Visual C++), wbcc / winebcc (Borland C++ if
> memory serves), etc.

I'm all for winegcc and these variants. It's not that much longer to 
type, it's much
clearer (nobody's going to look at their /usr/bin directory and think 
'what's wgcc?'),
and most of the time it's going to be in a Makefile anyway.

David