On Thu, 20 Aug 2020, Paul Gofman wrote: [...]
--- a/dlls/ntdll/tests/virtual.c +++ b/dlls/ntdll/tests/virtual.c @@ -516,9 +516,34 @@ static void test_NtMapViewOfSection(void)
[...]
- for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(feature_sizes); ++i)
- {
ok(xstate.AllFeatures[i] == feature_sizes[i], "Got unexpected AllFeatures[%u] %u, expected %u.\n", i,xstate.AllFeatures[i], feature_sizes[i]);ok(xstate.Features[i].Size == feature_sizes[i], "Got unexpected Features[%u].Size %u, expected %u.\n", i,xstate.Features[i].Size, feature_sizes[i]);
This test has failures on w7u and Windows 8.1: https://test.winehq.org/data/patterns.html#ntdll:virtual
* I suspect it mishandles 32-bit CPUs which would explain the failure on w7u. * For Windows 8.1 it may just be a broken behavior (which is masked on the TestBot because w8 and w864 skip this test). * Finally there was a broken() case that was introduced for win10pro but in fact it is necessary for all Windows 10 versions. So at a minimum the comment should be changed. But I'm not sure it makes sense to consider the behavior broken.
I've created a bug report to keep track of all that: https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51188
Could you have a look?