Re: Solving patch series collisions with domains?

[Francois Gouget]

On Fri, 6 Mar 2020, Zebediah Figura wrote:
[...]
> > Would taking the domain make sense? Would it be worth it?
>
> Wait, so why isn't checking In-Reply-To enough here?

To make sure there's no confusion: the TestBot is not taking In-Reply-To 
into account so far.

Also taking In-Reply-To into account while preserving compatibility with 
unthreaded patch series is a bit tricky whereas domain support would be 
simpler. But I agree that having support for In-Reply-To is the sane way 
to go.

So I looked into it and updated the corresponding bug with a proposed 
way forward:

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48353

For now I'm sending the patch to take the patch series version into 
account and I'm keeping In-Reply-To support in my todo list.