On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 13:28:56 -0600, Jeremy White jwhite@codeweavers.com wrote:
Tom,
That first is an article that went up, and then was taken down. The authors were mystified as to why it was ordered removed.
It later 'reappeared', but as you can see, it's broken in appeareance, which suggests that it went back up by accident, rather than by intention.
Jeremy,
Thanks for the information here, I was not aware the four articles were ever removed. I thought they had only moved the articles from 106 to 128.
So I don't think Scott's statement is untrue.
I didn't mean to say if was false just that I didn't agree with how it was stated as there are clearly four articles at developerworks.
With that said, I believe I'm talking in a area where I'm really not up to speed on what has taken place in the past. So it would be best for me at this time to "apologize" if my last statement was incorrect and do some reading before I post on this subject in the future..
Cheers,
-Tom