Re: [PATCH 2/2] opencl: Basic OpenCL 1.0 implementation. (try 2)

[Peter Urbanec]

On 30/11/10 21:15, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Why are you loading everything dynamically instead of simply linking 
> to it?

Couple of reasons. First, a machine may or may not have an OpenCL 
implementation installed and it may or may not have the required 
hardware. Second, I am anticipating that when wine OpenCL 1.1 support is 
added, we'll need to determine whether the host is using OpenCL 1.0 or 
1.1, at runtime.