Re: [PATCH] user32: Add a timeout when sending WM_WINE_DESTROYWINDOW

[Andrew Eikum]

On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 03:54:14PM +0100, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> I don't think we want to simply ignore the failure and keep child
> windows alive when their parent is gone. Probably the sequence could be
> changed so that WM_WINE_DESTROYWINDOW is sent first, and WM_DESTROY is
> sent in the context of the target thread.

Makes sense, I can experiment with that.  Thanks.

Andrew