Thank you ! And excuse me! I was looking for some information about that in the mailing list archive and in the WineWeekly News but probably I did not pay enough attention.
Mike Hearn wrote:
http://winehq.org/news/?view=147#IWebBrowser%20Status
Some of the discussion is summed up there.
Basically Gecko is huge, roughly as big if not bigger than Wine itself. KHTML is understandable by one person. It's also more easily adapted to IEisms.
Alexandre, what's the reasoning behind the no C++ rule?
On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 10:26, Juan Rey Saura wrote:
Hi !
I've read in the list there is a project about compiling Mozilla under Wine, I think it would be great.
Several parts of wine need an IWebBrowser implemtation; CHM support, some applications... One implementation based on the khtml is in the works, but Mozilla does implement it yet ( see http://www.iol.ie/~locka/mozilla/mozilla.htm ).
Could Mozilla, under Wine or maybe native version, be used as a replacement for the IE IWebBrowser implementation?