Re: [PATCH] AcceptEx Impelementation

[Juan Lang]

> Ah. My apologies. My question was related to writing the
> implementation of acceptex. I have recently solved the problem and the
> question is now moot. The problem was related to a bug in the
> wineserver async implementation that appeared when a file descriptor
> handled its own polling events (like sockets) and garbage collection.
> Fixing the bug fixes the problem i was having earlier. Should I
> include those fixes in a separate patch or can I incorporate them into
> the acceptex patch? (Correct AcceptEx implementation relies on it).

Those fixes should be a separate patch, perhaps one in a series of patches.
--Juan