Re: make "bisected" a keyword in bugzilla?

[Dmitry Timoshkov]

Maarten Lankhorst  wrote:
> On 23-05-10 01:57, Dan Kegel wrote:
> > I think it's a good idea.  'regression' isn't as strong as 'bisected'.
> >
> > Unless there are objections, I'll add the keyword on Monday.
>
> I think I'll object. I don't see any point in the bisected tag that 
> regression doesn't already cover. As far as I know as soon as you tag 
> something as regression you either already have bisected it, or will be 
> asked to bisect it quickly after adding the regression tag.

Exactly. There shouldn't be not bisected bugs with the 'regression' keyword
in the first place.