Mike Hearn wrote:
On Thu, 2003-05-22 at 19:43, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
- Static link the library - now that will actually work. It is
equivalent to 2 without the maintanance headache.
Depending on how widely used it is, this may be an acceptable option. I don't really understand why you can't use the official header files thought that presumably do this name mangling.
I can. But then you have to use the EXACT same version in runtime.
If this is actually the scheme they use, don't worry about future versions not working - all future versions will have that function, they may have other versions with different end tags though.
So how come "nm -D" comes up with only one version of the function? I don't think they intend for this to be the case.
Opinions and thoughts, please.
looks like you're stuck anyway :(
Thanks `-).
thanks -mike
I'm going to static link. It seems like the only sensible solution. Since I have 2.1, and Eric has 2.6, there is little hope of doing dynamic linking and hoping for it to work.
Shachar