Re: user32/tests: Add additional test for window station name.

[Alexandre Julliard]

Sebastian Lackner  writes:
> Before I resend, may I ask why this patch is pending? If its because of the hardcoded "0x0",
> I can change that of course. The main point is to show that window stations without a name
> get assigned one by the operating system. Applications depend on this when they "manually"
> implement window station inheritance (query name and later pass it to CreateProcess).

Sorry, I wanted to look more into this behavior, but haven't found the
time yet. But the test is fine, I should have applied it.