30 Oct
2018
30 Oct
'18
11:34 a.m.
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 01:19:04PM +0200, Gabriel Ivăncescu wrote:
BTW about the boolean, I just want to ask to be sure about this please:
The alternative would be to use a small goto as it was originally, all it does is basically break twice to outer scope (i.e. it's like "break 2" if C had such feature, or "break label" in some other languages). I suppose that's not acceptable though, right?
You already know the answer to the goto question. The reason I was querying about the need for the boolean, is that it's essentially mirroring n == 0 so, at first look, it might be possible to rewrite using that condition on the outer loop.
Huw.