At 07:04 PM 6/6/02 +0200, Patrik Stridvall wrote:
First of all since it was in parts their code the could have relicensed it to whatever they wished, so that wouldn't have been that large problem.
No quite true. If the code is based on previous LGPL code, they couldn't relicense it, unless they also coded all of that previous stuff. That's the whole point of the LGPL.
Secondly who are you to tell people what they can or can't do for a living?
Huh? Did I say it was wrong what they did? Please provide some evidence, otherwise apologize...
Roland