Re: Backtrace Dumps

[Alexandre Julliard]

Robert Shearman  writes:
> Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> > Well, I can also imagine a lot of cases where the in-process backtrace
> > won't work right, the main one being that since the code will never be
> > used unless you want a backtrace, when you try to use it you'll
> > realize that it no longer works, or doesn't even compile anymore. If
> > we call the debugger instead, it will use the standard backtrace code
> > which is always compiled in, and regularly used by a lot of people.
>
> Do you want me to write a unit test that uses it then?

No, the backtrace should be done by the debugger.