On 09/18/2009 01:42 PM, Markus Stockhausen wrote:
Hi,
as I was encouraged to resent the patch from last week in git format I hope it will be better this time.
Best regards
Hi Markus,
After reading this patch again, it seems to me it's not a 100% correct. There is a slight difference in passing hdcSrc as NULL compared to retrieving dcSrc via get_dc_ptr.
The actual test sets hdcSrc to NULL, so the corresponding test in the implementation should be:
if (!hdcSrc) return FALSE;
dcSrc = get_dc_ptr ( hdcSrc );
Now, I don't know whether get_dc_ptr can fail but that's a different matter.