Lauri Kenttä lauri.kentta@gmail.com writes:
On 2016-12-08 18:14, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Lauri Kenttä lauri.kentta@gmail.com writes:
On 2016-12-08 17:58, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Lauri Kenttä lauri.kentta@gmail.com writes:
v2: Win8 and Win10 give different results (sometimes even different different results), so mark some cases as broken. Also simplify the patch overall.
I don't think that painting on the desktop window is a very useful test, and it can fail for various reasons. If the goal is to test LockWindowUpdate, you should do that with top-level windows instead.
If painting to desktop is not interesting, then bug 52 (the oldest open bug) should probably be closed.
As I mentioned in a comment there, that's mostly a WONTFIX. There may be a use for LockWindowUpdate in other cases, but scribbling over the desktop is not a particularly interesting case.
I thought your comment was about virtual desktop vs. WM integration. Are you now extending that WONTFIX to virtual desktop as well? In that case, I'd really close bug 52, which is about the desktop.
I don't mind if we keep it open for virtual desktops, but I don't think any effort should be spent on it until we find a real application that needs it (and TBH, fixing it would be quite hard, so it would need to cause a bad problem to make it worth the effort).