Re: [PATCH 3/4] quartz/tests: Check that system clock measurements are in sequence instead of comparing absolute time.

[Zebediah Figura (she/her)]

On 7/22/21 1:59 PM, Francois Gouget wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Jul 2021, Marvin wrote:
> [...]
> > === w1064v1809 (32 bit report) ===
> >
> > quartz:
> > systemclock.c:191: Test failed: Got timestamps 660270000, 660310000, 660270000.
> >
> > === w1064 (32 bit report) ===
> >
> > quartz:
> > systemclock.c:191: Test failed: Got timestamps 601610000, 601560000, 601610000.
>
> It looks like this does fail on about every Windows version, VM or not:
>
> https://test.winehq.org/data/patterns.html#quartz:systemclock
>
> I guess you're already looking into it?

Yep, it's already on my list.