I think that's a great idea but would it be cheeky of me to suggest that at the same time, the general state of the to-do information be updated as well?
Just as a somewhat newbie diving in, there's a lot of stuff spread out over various places in both www.winehq.org / wiki.winehq.org that describes current status, todo lists for dll's in a couple of formats, suggested things that need to be fixed, some of the lists have ticks against them - (does this mean they need to be fixed still?) Then there's the checklists on the various developer pages...
It's hard to look at the website and definitively think "right, what needs doing?" when there's such a spread of information, some of which doesn't look like it's being maintained.
-- Chris
Kai Blin wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm currently looking into getting an up-to-date list of maintainers for certain subsystems. I would like to keep that in the context of the dll status pages, but in order to keep them maintainable, I'm considering to move those pages to the wiki.
Any thoughts about that?
Cheers, Kai