On 11/16/21 18:34, Jinoh Kang wrote:
On 11/17/21 02:33, Rémi Bernon wrote:
On 11/16/21 18:27, Jinoh Kang wrote:
Since vl_buffer is intended for non-ASCII data (including null byte), how about "packet_buffer" or "reply_buffer"?
"reply_buffer" seems alright I guess.
Thanks! So I guess the change shall be:
- struct vl_buffer -> struct reply_buffer
- vl_append -> reply_buffer_append (ditto for other functions)
(also, sorry for top-posting)
Sounds good.