Re: Improving debugging (gdb) support

[Alexandre Julliard]

Eric Pouech  writes:
> I'm not sure that this is so important...
> WineDbg support for 16 bit exec has been broken since the address space
> separation, and no one really complained...
> support as it is now for 16 bit app (ie single stepping in 16 bit code)
> is supported by all options.

Does gdb really support 16-bit pointers now?  Otherwise I don't see
how you can step through 16-bit code. And even if 16-bit binaries are
not really important, support for 16-bit pointers definitely is.