Re: FW: Re: please reduce the four registrations on the single winehq.org site.

[Steven Edwards]

On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Sparr wrote:
> Was the contempt for OpenID in general, or the idea of using an
> existing third party as an OpenID providers?  Although it would be
> against the spirit of OpenID, it would be possible for one WineHQ
> service to provide OpenID only to other WineHQ services, and for them
> to only accept an OpenID from that particular WineHQ provider.  This
> would be no better than other single-sign-on solutions, but there are
> a lot more open source cross-framework implementations of OpenID
> available than for most other solutions.

I think its best if the google contingent answer that. Dan had some
issues with it I think but I don't know if any of them are still
applicable.

Thanks