Re: [PATCH 08/11] winegstreamer: Genericize gstreamer callback system.

[Derek Lesho]

On 2020-02-05 09:36, Zebediah Figura wrote:
> Also, while I don't object to renaming the callbacks to match GStreamer
> names (and would probably prefer it), if you're going to have the
> individual callback functions be specific to e.g. quartz vs mfplat vs
> wmvcore (which is probably the best way to go), I don't particularly see
> the point in renaming them to be "more generic".

I'm not sure what you're referring to here, I didn't rename any of the 
callback wrappers.