Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
On March 23, 2003 01:50 pm, Eric Pouech wrote:
I think we need to define clearly what is going to appear on winehq on one hand, and on SF on the other hand:
- which parts/info... are only be hosted on winehq
- which parts/info... are only be hosted on SF
- which parts/info... are only be hosted on both
For now things are pretty clear: -- the "Home" on SF points to www.winehq.org -- we are going to store only downloadable files on SF:
- official tarballs
- 3rd party support files that we can distribute
- as many binary packages as possible (currently, we have binary packages for Debian and Suse, but the respective maintainers have not voiced their opinion on the matter).
-- the other SF features (mailing lists, CVS, bug tracker, patch tracker, etc.) are not currently used. However, I will try to monitor the bug & patch tracker in case people start using them.
Did I leave anything out?
my point was really to ensure that winehq.org will remain the focal point for wine. this seems to be the case for now (but "for now" can always change) A+