Re: [PATCH] dinput: Avoid negating FAILED()

[Michael Stefaniuc]

On 10/19/21 23:06, Rémi Bernon wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Rémi Bernon
>
> I don't really mind, but it's a bit longer to write and I probably got used to 
> using FAILED more or less consistently as some kind of error handling keyword. 
> Is it actually making a difference?

It is a true no-op so no difference there.
Just a style issue issue, supposedly easier to read. And "think positive" and such.
Not a big issue but Wine is fairly consistent there with just a handful of 
stragglers added each year, if at all.

bye
    michael