At this time, I'm not a developer since i released no code for the moment, but I'm a contributor in the sense I made some bug reports.
But if I will release some code, this will be under a xGPL license. If there are forks, that's a good point, but only if the developer makes reference to the original code.
Time of reinventing the wheel in every program is over ! xGPL is here !
--- dschwarz@bellatlantic.net a écrit : >
Well, I'm fairly convinced after reading his argument that LGPL is the right way to go. I think it's better for the Wine project over the long term.
For those companies who have built a business model on closed source enhancements to Wine, there is still a way to play the game:
At some point Wine is going to improve to the point where the core code works well enough to do almost everything we need. There will always be room for improvement, but the action may shift to reimplementing Microsoft applications that have important APIs (Internet Explorer, Windows Media Player...).
I'm sure that Microsoft will change its EULAs to prohibit use of applications such as MSIE on a Non-Microsoft OS. It has already started doing this for some programs.
Companies could respond by selling open or closed source reimplementations of these applications, bundled with a LGPL Wine. There will always be plenty of ways to add value on top of the core Wine code.
Meanwhile, LGPL ensures that core code improvements will flow back to benefit all, not just those individuals and companies that have an altruistic bent.
Regards,
Daniel Schwarz dschwarz@bellatlantic.net http://www.winecentric.com http://winecentric.com/wiki
___________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en français ! Yahoo! Mail : http://fr.mail.yahoo.fr