Re: advpack.c must be compiled with optimization?

[Dan Kegel]

On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 11:14 PM, Maarten Lankhorst
 wrote:
> > Oddly, if I compile the wine tree without -O2, the following
> > test fails:
> >
> > ../../../wine advpack_test.exe.so advpack.c
> > advpack.c:441: Test failed: Expected C:\Program Files, got C:\
>
> Out of curiosity I tried to do the same, it doesn't fail for me,
> however I do get an 'unexpected pass into todo block' in
> fusion/asmcache.c Valgrinding it gives even different results. (And a
> lot of warnings of heapfree being used on a malloc in strdup)

I think http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2008-May/055234.html
fixes the latter problem...