On Jan 13, 2008 6:53 PM, Dan Kegel dank@kegel.com wrote:
On my machine, we've been hovering between five and ten test suite failures for some time (see http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9916 )
IMHO one of the hallmarks of 1.0 should be reliably getting zero test suite failures. That would make regressions stand out like sore thumbs instead of requiring developers to diff results before and after their changes, and might result in fewer regressions getting committed.
How 'bout folks spend some time tracking the current six odd failures down and cleaning them up?
- Dan
-- Wine for Windows ISVs: http://kegel.com/wine/isv
Sounds like a worthy goal IMO. It seems theres much more than 5 or 6 things which need work though: http://test.winehq.org/data/200801121000/ Perhaps we should try and have the nightly suite also pass all tests -- or is this too much of a frivolous goal?