Re: GDI+: headers and one test

[Alexandre Julliard]

Francois Gouget  writes:
> Hmm, this is not the same as the PSDK. The PSDK only defines 'enum 
> Status { ... }' which, in theory, should only allow one to use 'enum 
> Status' and not 'Status'. Yet the PSDK headers seem to make use of 
> 'Status'. This might be different in C++ though... 
> So on the whole it's probably ok to use a typedef. I just prefer to 
> bring this up so others can chime in.

I think it's better without the typedef, in C we can simply use 'enum
Status'.