Re: Systray patch but explorified

[Alexandre Julliard]

Mike Hearn  writes:
> On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 19:06:04 +0100, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> > The other thing that needs to be done differently is that the
> > WS_EX_TRAYWINDOW flag has to go, that's not Windows compatible. We
> > need to define an appropriate interface that doesn't involve
> > overloading Win32 flags.
>
> OK, would an atom set on the window be appropriate here?

It's not even clear that we want a window at all. I think the right
way is to first design a stand-alone systray (which we'll need for
desktop mode anyway) and then plug XEMBED into that.