Re: Vista compatibility page

[Stefan Dösinger]

> I mean .... 5 years! FIVE YEARS! And this is what they have to show for
> it? A bunch of .NET APIs that they intend to backport to XP, and which
> require a runtime nobody seems to be using for desktop apps anyway. An
> improved file protection hack. Some improved security, and a display
> rewrite equivalent to what David Reveman was able to produce on his own
> in only 2 years?

Not to forget the Digital Rights Management stuff. But thats definitly 
something I don't want. Improved security with a lot of "backdoors" for 
Windows Installer to stay user-friedly.

It doesn't look like Vista will enlarge Wines ToDo list noticeable ;)