* On Fri, 6 Jan 2006, Paul Millar wrote:
- On Friday 06 Jan 2006 01:29, Saulius Krasuckas wrote:
I think compiled EXEs should be released regardless of their generation date. No?
Excuse me for my typos and logical mistakes, but..
Personally, I'd prefer building winetest.exe as part of WRT (auto regression testing based on CVS commits). WRT builds winetest.exe anyway (in fact, all the DLLs and EXEs it can), but the results are not registered, so no one sees them.
I didn't got it - when do the results get not registered? Or when it does?
However, dealing with asynchronous updates was thought both too difficult and not necessary so we have the synchronous once-a-day builds. I'm maintaining a separate cron-triggered build process,
Are its results public? :) What belongs to WRT and what does to your separate build process?
The winetest infrastructure was originally designed to work with once-a-day releases, although I'm not sure if that restriction is used within the code. Changing it to work with potentially more frequent releases might require no extra work, or a fair bit.
Paul, just to note, I am perfectly fine with a per-day releases. :)
In favour of the status quo: it works, its simple, you have to wait (at most) one day [*] and there's no need to change any of the winetest/winrash/.. infrastructure.
In favour of change: faster turn-around (and would make my life a bit simpler :^)
Well, I may not understand your reply correctly, but why then I see only 1 release during 2006 year at the of the page [2]:
[DIR] 200512271000/ 06-Jan-2006 04:05 - [DIR] 200601061000/ 06-Jan-2006 05:50 -
when WRT summary page [3] tells us there were several successful builds in this year already:
Thu Jan 5 17:29:03 Wed Jan 4 20:51:31 Wed Jan 4 15:00:50 Tue Jan 3 21:38:32 Tue Jan 3 14:38:04
Has that happend due to lack of running Winrash clients during this time? My Winrash stayed IDLE when I had launched it several times.
[2] http://test.winehq.org/data/ [3] http://www.astro.gla.ac.uk/users/paulm/WRT/wrt.php