re: [PATCH] kernel32: GetPrivateProfileSectionNamesA error checking (Coverity)

[Dan Kegel]

AJ wrote:
> Marcus Meissner <marcus at jet.franken.de> writes:
> > buffer and size need to be either 0 at the same time or not,
> > otherwise this breaks up. Windows is inconsistent (either crashes
> > or returns invalids), so we can just add checking.
>
> If Windows crashes we don't need extra checks. Just tell Coverity that
> crashing is allowed here.

If later versions of Windows return INVALID_PARAMETER,
wouldn't it be ok for Wine to do so rather than crashing?
In other words, isn't it ok to emulate the 'best' behaved
version of windows in cases like this, rather than the 'worst'?