Re: ShellExecute patch

[Alexandre Julliard]

Duane Clark  writes:
> One of several problems I see in my patch (obviously I should have
> slept on it before submitting) was that it would not return hProcess
> when requested. Getting that info appears to me to require an explicit
> call to CreateProcess, rather than using WinExec.

True, it does; OTOH returning a valid instance from ShellExecute16
requires a WinExec... another possible solution is to simply implement
a completely separate ShellExecute16 by copying the relevant parts of
the code.