On 2/5/20 10:28 AM, Derek Lesho wrote:
On 2020-02-05 09:36, Zebediah Figura wrote:
Also, while I don't object to renaming the callbacks to match GStreamer names (and would probably prefer it), if you're going to have the individual callback functions be specific to e.g. quartz vs mfplat vs wmvcore (which is probably the best way to go), I don't particularly see the point in renaming them to be "more generic".
I'm not sure what you're referring to here, I didn't rename any of the callback wrappers.
Eh, never mind, I see what you're doing here; I guess it makes sense.